Showing posts with label Laura Robson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Laura Robson. Show all posts

Saturday, January 9, 2010

Jodi's Epic Tennis Adventure 1.3 - Back to the Future

Little Laura Robson is a revelation. Well, I say little - she's probably got a good half a foot on me, if not more. But she is just fifteen, and I find that unbelievable. Instead of whinging about high school, gazing at posters of boys and singing that annoying Taylor Swift song about being fifteen, she is travelling around the world playing tennis.

And she is damn good.

I was lucky enough to be there to see her play Elena Dementieva on Friday at the Hopman Cup after a lovely second night in Perth, and although the second set was a bit of a Dementieva 'no, this is how you hit groundies' clinic, in the first set, Robson seriously troubled her. She managed to break her twice - Dementieva doesn't have the bestest serve ever or anything, but she's #5 in the world, and Robson is fifteen. Fif-frigging-teen.

And then yesterday she beat Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez, a match which I didn't see, but which I wish I had. She is going to be epically awesome in a few years. Just you wait.

But back to my day there. I was on the other side of the court this time (non-umpire side) in the lower deck and I had a great view. It was really interesting to analyse the way the Dementieva and Robson games matched up, because Robson is going to grow into a similar player, I think. They're both heavy groundstrokers - Elena has the experience that comes with age and practice and stuff, but Laura (fifteen! fifteen!) definitely held her own. Where I really noticed the difference is where their shots landed in the box. Dementieva hits very deep, and although Robson was clearly trying, some of her shots were more in the service line area, particularly if she was on the defensive. But she has time to work on this. On account of she is fifteen.

Murray was totally clinical in his dismantling of Igor Andreev and it was excellent to watch, even though Andreev is clearly not in form and not looking at all threatening for the Australian Open. (Meanwhile, Muzz, losing to Robredo? WTF?) But the real match of the day was the mixed doubles. I wish there was more of this played, because it is SUCH a good spectator sport. Murray was quite paternalistic towards Robson at the beginning, trying to do everything himself, but she soon proved she was quite capable and he let her alone, to his credit. Robson held her own in forehand rallies with Andreev admirably, and Dementieva's hands at the net were great, and... yeah, this was a really good match.

That said, I kind of wish the Brits had lost, because I would have loved to have seen the scheduled Kazakhstan/Germany match, mostly because of my newfound love for Andrey Golubev. And also because it would have delayed my trip to the airport, where I had to spend a very long time before my plane to Brisbane left. And let me tell you, Perth airport is not an especially interesting place.

All in all, I loved my time in Perth - even the time I spent sitting next to a guy who kept persisting in trying to explain things like let rules to me even though I had already said I was a tennis blogger and that I knew all the rules, thank you very much. (A classic mansplainer - spew.) It's sometimes hard to watch tennis when people around you are talking about tennis to each other, pretending they know what they talk about when they obviously don't.

But there is nothing like watching real live tennis. Nothing at all.

I don't know if I will go back to the Hopman Cup next year - Perth is a long, long way away from everywhere, and is pretty expensive. However, the year after, I am so there. I want to see it in the new stadium!

Saturday, July 5, 2008

Sorority

A Williams victory. I told you so, didn't I?
*
Okay, I'm finished attempting to be funny now, due to obvious failure.
*
This was always going to be both a very interesting and a very boring match. I'm not a huge fan of the Williams-style power game - I prefer the game that Hingis used to play, where it was all about cunning and placement. Not that Venus and Serena don't have those things, but let's face it: a lot of their prowess comes from the fact that you don't want to get in the way of the ball when they hit it.
*
The power game lends itself to boring tennis, which is why Venus and Serena are sometimes a little dull to watch. I'm not saying that they don't have excellent tennis IQs or anything like that (just to clarify) but sometimes it can get a bit boring, watching these mini rallies where they just about break the other girl's arm. But Venus and Serena have such similar games that watching them play each other is a whole different story. It's like watching a mirror sometimes.
*
If I had to pick one and say 'this Williams is the superior Williams' I would probably pick Serena. She seems to have the tiniest bit more variety - she changes it up more than Venus. But Venus is on the whole the steadier of the two - she makes less errors and goes for less winners (comparatively.) And that was why she won today.
*
She and Serena understand each other so well that there was almost a psychic level to the match - they could pick which way the other one was going to go on volleys and suchlike and they were there and waiting many more times than in an ordinary match. It was a bit disappointing that Serena couldn't pull out that first set, because if the match had gone into a third I think it would have been anyone's game. But you can't take this one away from Venus. She played sensible tennis, steady tennis, smart tennis, and as a reward, she held up the Venus Rosewater trophy for the fifth time.
*
And five Wimbledons is quite an achievement. Ask Roger Federer. Of course, six is even better.
*
And then the Williams girls went on to win the doubles, giving them pretty much a clean sweep. I mean, there's still mixed doubles for one other girl on the tour to get a trophy, but as far as the women go, this has been a Williams Wimbledon (tm.) It was really interesting seeing all the seeds getting knocked out early and stuff, but if you look at the run Venus and Serena had through the tournament, they didn't actually face any of the top, top girls until they got to the final. Serena took out Agnieszka Radwanska (a player still on the rise) and Amelie Mauresmo (a player falling down.) Venus beat Elena Dementieva (fairy floss serve) but didn't face another seed at all before the final. What would have happened, I wonder, if the Ivanovics and Sharapovas had played tighter and made it into the second week? What result would we have seen then?
*
The fact that they didn't only further proves that the Williams girls deserved their victories - but even if they had, I don't know what good it would have done. Can you see Jankovic, with her injuries, getting through Venus? Ivanovic, for all her power, outhitting Serena? Not on grass, my friends, not on grass.
*
I've said before that I think claiming the Williams girls would be #1 and #2 if they committed a bit more to tennis is very unfair, and I stand by that. But at Wimbledon, in these two weeks, I think the story is a bit different. Seven out of the last nine years, a Williams has won Wimbledon - and even in 2004, when Sharapova won it, Serena was in the final. Three of those nine years, both Williams girls have come through the draw to the final. And that's not even mentioning the doubles...
*
It must have been interesting being a fly on the wall in the Williams house yesterday and today. By all accounts, Venus and Serena do just about everything together. I wonder if that changed at all? Did they sit and watch a movie together, or talk doubles tactics? Or did they deliberately do their own things?
*
Serena seemed very annoyed that she didn't win. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think Venus had ever beaten her on grass before, and this was the first time. She insisted repeatedly that Venus was just another opponent, and she left it all on the court, ra ra ra. Venus on the other hand, was all concerned about Serena's feelings when she won, because Serena lost, etc etc etc. I wonder... do you think they would be saying the opposite things if Serena had won and Venus had lost? Victory can afford to be magnanimous.
*
Note how I haven't talked about men's tennis yet. How good am I? And I'm not going to... too much. Today belongs to the Williams sisters. But I will say this: go Roger! If Venus can make it five, you can make it six, baby... and remember, I predicted THREE DAMN SETS - so make me look good, please!
*
I believe in the Mighty Fed. I believe. And I know the Mighty Fed believes in the Mighty Fed too, and that can never be bad.
*
Two last things: big congratulations to Daniel Nestor, who now owns a career Grand Slam in doubles after partnering Nenad Zimonjic to the final!
*
And secondly: Laura Robson, you may have won junior Wimbledon, but I saw Marat Safin first.
*
*
Wimbledon Results - Day #12
*
Women's Draw
*
Venus Williams def. Serena Williams, 7-5 6-4