Still A Dope

So if Wayne Odesnik wins in Houston, it's going to be the most awkward trophy ceremony ever.

Actually, you know what? If he does win, I don't think they should even have a trophy ceremony. They shouldn't give him a trophy and they shouldn't give him prize money, because it's all going to be taken away anyway. Because the dude f*cking cheated and if he thinks anything different is going to be proven he has got another think coming.

You know that things are bad for a sportsman when sportsmen from the same country are actively baying for their blood. Sport is quite parochial, traditionally - even tennis, which is hardly a team sport. But Andy Roddick and Sam Querrey, to name a couple, want Odesnik gone. Roddick thinks he should be gone from tennis, bam. Querrey refuses to lose to him.

And fair enough, Sam. You shouldn't even have to play this dude. And even the current doping rules are allowing him to play, and the ITF hasn't slammed down the banhammer like happened in the infamous Belgian case a while back, Odesnik should not be playing. He admitted to possessing HGH and that, by itself, is going to be a two year ban. And no one deserves to have to play - and, as has happened so far in Houston - lose to a cheater.

I bet one Jerzy Janowicz is quite pissed off right now... and I bet he, and pretty much everyone in the sport of tennis at the moment, is identifying as one of Sam Querrey's Samurai for the next match.

Dope

So, doping rules. What's up with them? Because sure as hell am not understanding them.

How is it than when Richard Gasquet was caught having cocaine in his blood - a drug that probably would not enhance his performance at all, however illegal it might be - he was tossed out of the sport until his name had been cleared... but when Wayne Odesnik gets caught with eight vials of human growth hormone, which is definitely a performance enhancing drug, he... plays Houston?

I'm guessing it has something to do with possession vs it actually being in your bloodstream, but come on. Look at the great debacle of Yanina Wickmayer and Xavier Malisse, who were out in the cold for ages. The way I see it, the offenses of Wickmayer, Malisse and Gasquet combined - and, you know what, throw Hingis in there for good measure - are nothing compared to what Odesnik is guilty of here. What Odesnik has done is a serious, serious offence in a clean sport.

So how is it that he's not suspended? If Wickmayer and co are guilty until proven innocent, what's up with the Odesnik ruling?

I have no doubt that if/when Odesnik gets convicted or sentenced or whatever they call it, he will be out on his arse. Andy Roddick said he should be thrown out of tennis and I agree wholeheartedly - and I think a whole lot of the tennis world does too. I don't understand why he is allowed to play at the moment, but the fact stands that he should not be playing. And that's something he should have realised himself. Just because you can play doesn't mean you should.

I bet things are real chilly in the locker room for Odesnik right now...

The Dope Undoped

Well, the verdict is in, the hammer has fallen, and Richard Gasquet has effectively got off his doping charge.

*

Kind of, I guess - I don't know if you can call missing Roland Garros and Wimbledon getting off scot-free - there's an inevitable hit in the rankings points that will happen. But the ITF ruled that because Gasquet pulled out of the match for which he provided the sample in Miami, the sample was taken to be 'out of competition' and thus the full twelve month ban did not apply. Instead, he was given a ban of two months and fifteen days, starting on 1 May and continuing to July 15 - so he's already served it.

*

The plea that Gasquet entered was 'negligence' and I think that's very apt. He was, in short, a dope. You have to be so careful when you're a sportsperson - doping rules are so tough. I remember a case several years back in Australia where one of our swimmers was ruled out for ages because her coach gave her a cold and flu drug. It's not an arena you can let your guard down in for a second.

*

The last I read, Gasquet was blaming his positive result on a woman called Pamela he'd kissed in Miami. Let that be a lesson to you, Richard... parties + sport do not mix. Not that I would wish all the joy to be taken out of the lives of tennis players, but this is proof of just how careful they have to be. Richard was negligent, but I don't think he was criminal. Tentatively, I'm welcoming you back, Monsieur.

*

Now I want you to deserve your place. No more headcase. No more stupid. No more negligence. I want to see you glad to be back. You've had to fight for your place on the tour now, you know that it is a privilege, not a right. Now earn it.

*

*

Today's Results

*

Catella Swedish Open (Bastad)

*

Tommy Robredo def. Peter Luczak, 6-2 6-3

Nicolas Almagro def. Marat Safin, 6-3 7-6 (8-6)

Robin Soderling def. Kristof Vliegen, 6-2 6-3

Daniel Gimeno-Traver def. Frederico Gil, 6-1 6-4

Teimuraz Gabashvili def. Bjorn Phau, 6-3 6-2

*

*

Mercedes Cup (Stuttgart)

*

Paul-Henri Mathieu def. Mikhail Youzhny, 7-6 (7-4) 7-6 (7-4)

Alexandre Sidorenko def. Oscar Hernandez, 2-6 6-4 6-3

Victor Hanescu def. Rainer Schuettler, 6-2 6-1

Martin Vassallo Arguello def. Andrey Golubev, 3-6 6-3 6-0

*

*

ECM Prague Open (Prague)

*

Francesca Schiavone def. Polona Hercog, 6-2 6-2

Sybille Bammer def. Alla Kudryavtseva, 6-1 6-1

Carla Suarez Navarro def. Barbora Zahlavova Strycova, 6-1 6-4

Lucie Hradecka def. Karolina Sprem, 6-2 4-6 6-4

*

*

Internazionali Femminili di Tennis di Palermo (Palermo)

*

Flavia Pennetta def. Roberta Vinci, 7-5 6-1

Olga Govortsova def. Ekaterina Makarova, 6-2 6-2

Aravane Rezai def. Varvara Lepchenko, 6-7 (2-7) 6-4 6-2

Tathiana Garbin def. Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez, 6-2 6-3

Patty Schnyder def. Anastasia Pivovarova, 6-4 6-0