Showing posts with label Alisa Kleybanova. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Alisa Kleybanova. Show all posts

Thursday, January 13, 2011

Things Get Weird For Kim

Rally For Relief at the Australian Open sold out in a matter of hours. That is about 15,000 tickets, gone like that. And one of them is mine!

I am seriously so proud of the tennis community for this. Hit For Haiti last year was absolutely extraordinary and Rally For Relief sounds like it will be exactly the same. And the support that it's receiving... well, it's a testament to the generosity of both tennis players and fans. The community has pulled together incredibly. Well done, everyone!

It feels like I've talked more about wildcards and rallies than actual tennis in the last couple of days, so probably I should do something about that. Though one brief wildcard note before I do start talking about tennis actually happening in this actual week - Sabine Lisicki is playing qualifying. WHAT. IS. UP. WITH THAT.

It's people like Sabine Lisicki and Nicolas Mahut that illustrate SO CLEARLY why we need a Wildcard For Awesome. As a tennis fan, I feel like it's a serious injustice on both of them. Here's hoping they both qualify - I will be at their matches for sure!

Now. Onto Sydney.

That match between Clijsters and Kleybanova was... well. Whenever people start talking about how excellent Kimmie's looking - including me - it always seems to me like she pulls out a match like this one. The shoulders slump, she gets dejected, and no matter how invincible she's been looking, weird things start to happen.

The classic example is, of course, that loss in Melbourne last year to Nadia Petrova, where she got totally hammered. She managed to pull out the win over Kleybanova - she did wake up enough to play an excellent tiebreaker - but it is concerning.

The only tournament where this doesn't seem to happen is the US Open, where Kim is charmed. I think Kim has a really good shot at being #1 if she makes a good run in Australia, so here's hoping that she's got her weirdnesses out in this match and brings it in Melbourne. With Serena out, the Australian Open genuinely is anyone's tournament - and why not Kim's? (Though I must confess that, in my heart, I am pulling for the other Belgian lady. Justine Henin for the win!)

Saturday, September 25, 2010

More Haikus for a Dull Week

Romania


Chela won this one
I had wholly forgotten
That he existed.



Metz


This one went to Gilles
Back in 2008
He was good... but now?



Seoul

AKley disappeared
For a while - but now - yay! Seoul!
...doesn't mean that much.



Tashkent


Alla in Tashkent
She lost to Jarka last week
This is a good run.

Sunday, May 30, 2010

Oh Hi, Captain Obvious

It is absolutely KILLING me that the best match of the women's side so far is all tied up at one set all at the suspension of play. I want to know what happens, damn it!

Henin/Sharapova may not be one of the most immediately obvious of the WTA rivalries, but I think it is certainly one of the most compelling. I will never forget that three hour match they played at the year ending championships a few years back, where Henin got through - or that absolute beatdown MaSha put on JuJu at the AO early the next year. Even when neither is on top of their game, they both play totally watchable tennis when they play each other.

And, I confess, I'm sort of hoping they wear each other out and make Sam Stosur's path that little bit easier... look at me, all parochial. Who woulda thunk.

The winners: Rafa Nadal. Duh. He is putting the beatdown on anyone who so much as looks at him sideways. I know clay isn't Lleyton Hewitt's best surface, but Rafa put him down like a rabid dog. Scary stuff.

A beatdown was also issued by, surprisingly, Jurgen Melzer. Totes did not expect him to beat Ferrer, mostly because I had completely forgotten he existed. I'm pretty sure this is the Djokovic quarter, which means Melzer has a good a chance as any of winning it. Go the Jurgenator.

And from the women, let's talk Sam Stosur, who had a sweetly routine win over Anastasia Pivovarova. And let's also talk Daniela Hantuchova, whom I also always forget about, who triumphed unexpectedly against Yanina Wickmayer. Great stuff from both ladies.

The losers: David Ferrer. Big time. He had what was basically a clear path to the quarters, and he screwed it up and screwed it up good. Like, a screw up of an epic degree. I understand that Jurgen Melzer was playing awesome tennis, but straights, Ferru? Really?

And I have to put Yanina Wickmayer in here as well. I know DaniHani is massively talented, but hello, Yanina, so are you. I guess she's just come off elbow surgery, so I shouldn't be too harsh on her, but I totally thought she was a dark horse for this section of the draw. And I don't like being proven wrong.

Oh look, Captain Obvious has just paid us a visit? You know who was a big-ass loser today at Roland Garros? Andy Roddick. I know he was maybe sick and he doesn't exactly love clay, but he should at least have been able to take a set off Gabashvili. At least.

The disappointments: Juan Carlos Ferrero. I totally picked him to come through his section of the draw, and he did not do me proud, to say the least. You can beat Novak Djokovic is breathing a lot easier (allergies aside) now that the two Spaniards are out of his section. JCF totally had more in him than this.

And Alisa Kleybanova? WTF? I've seen Yaroslava Shvedova play live and she's got some serious game going on, but I thought Alisa would have been able to outclub her. Obviously I was wrong. Well done Slava, I guess.

Oh, and Captain Obvious has just informed me Marion Bartoli should be in here. I guess I never really pay enough attention to her (except to comment on her weird-ass shots) to notice when she loses.

The scraped-in-by-the-skin-of-teeth: Greetings, Nadia Petrova. I am so glad Nadz took out this match, not just because I like her (which I do) but because someone had to kill that damn gold dress. Nadz is super talented and totally deserves this fourth round run. I hope she can make it even further!

And oh hi, Robby Ginepri. I was very disappointed that your opponent JCF lost, but you totally deserved this win. Who woulda thunk you would be the good news story for American mens' tennis from this tournament? Certainly not me.

One to watch: Teimuraz Gabashvili. I know Roddick was not that well and doesn't like clay, but straights, dude? You've got a little sumthin' sumthin' going on if you can pull that one off. This could be his breakthrough tournament (even though it feels like he's been round for a million years...)

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Dangerous Belgians

I rated Justine Henin 'hot' on the hot or not scale a few days ago, and I would like to raise that to 'absolutely smokin' hot'. Damn, that girl is playing well.

It's been all 'oooh, your comeback's not so great now, is it, haw haw haw' since JuJu lost to A-Kley in Indian Wells, which really doesn't take into account the fact that a) A-Kley had mad skillz and b) it was a third set breaker. JuJu is absolutely steamrolling her opponents at the moment. This is one lady you do not want to face across the net. Elena Dementieva, who has met her early on in two tournaments now, must be doing the Dance of Joy, because after this tournament, JuJu will be back inside the top thirty and thus will be no more a dangerous floater.

Speaking of dangerous Belgians, Kim Clijsters was absolutely fierce against Victoria Azarenka today. Sure, Vika crumbled like too-dry pastry in the second set, but it was the face of the Clijsters Onslaught, which is enough to frustrate any player to tears (or violence - just ask Serena). I really wouldn't be surprised to see a Belgian take out this tournament - I just couldn't tell you which one.

And you know who else is a genuine contender? Sammy Stosur. She put a bit of a beating on Jelena Jankovic today, which, considering JJ beat her last week pretty easily, is a job well done indeed. If Sam can keep her head and not have one of those random match meltdowns she can be prone to, she has a great shot at the crown here. Wouldn't that be a great way to open her account as a top ten player...?

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

To Do A Wozniacki

This is a big league women's tournament. It may be traditionally sans Williamses, but we can agree on this, n'cest pas? Indian Wells is a big frigging deal.

And this is anyone's tournament.

Let's look not at who is in, but who is out. Kuznetsova. Azarenka. Sharapova. Henin. Clijsters. Think of a big name in tennis - she's probably goneski. This makes this one of the most open tournaments in forever, and there's a real chance that some total random could come through and win the whole thing. There are a few names left - Jankovic, Wozniacki, Zvonareva - but then there a whole bunch of that second tier down who have the most massive chance in forever to walk off with a massive title. I'm talking Kleybanova. I'm talking Stosur. I'm talking Wickmayer and Martinez Sanchez. This tournament is one of the biggest chances in ages for someone to really announce themselves on the women's tour.

When the big names in men's tennis go out, I find it disappointing. In women's tennis, we're in a place where I find it exciting. We're in a place where someone could do what Wozniacki did at the US Open and make the best of a bad situation , or, alternatively, a place where someone could massively step up to the plate. You might be able to tell that I am massively in favour of Option B. Specifically, I am in favour of Samantha Stosur running away with the entire thing, but it's going to be interesting either way. Fun times.

Meanwhile, over in the dudes, the big names pretty much survived, but they did it differently. Rafael Nadal was in total cruise control mode in his victory over Mario Ancic. Novak Djokovic came within three points of losing to Philipp Kohlschreiber.

Will the real #2 please stand up?

Sunday, January 25, 2009

A Day To Remember

Now THERE is a day of tennis the likes of which we have not seen for a while.
*
There were five matches on Rod Laver Arena, and every single one of them was a classic. It's hard to know where to start, so I guess we'll have to start at the beginning, with Jankovic against Bartoli. Who would ever have picked that Marion Bartoli, who would probably serve two handed if she could (and I bet she's tried!) would bounce the world number #1 so comprehensively? Of course, Jankovic is one of those weird #1s that hasn't won a major, but you still have to accumulate a lot of wins to get into the penthouse, and Bartoli has never come close to competing for that prize. I never, ever would have picked this one. I thought Bartoli was pretty much doomed to be a bottom-feeder, lurking in the top twenty but never doing that much after her run to the final at Wimbledon. But she's proving me wrong. There is more to Marion than meets the eye, apparently.
*
True, Jankovic certainly did not play anything resembling well. She didn't even turn up, really. But the sign of a real champion, the one who has the guts and the heart and the cojones to stay at the top, is one that fights through bad play and LOOKS FOR A WAY TO WIN. I didn't see any hint of that from Jankovic at all. Sure, she picked it up a bit after dropping the first set so comprehensively (Bartoli hit seven winners, Jankovic none) but she never, ever looked like winning - unlike another top player, who was in a situation just as dire, but who somehow never quite looked like losing. But we'll come to that.
*
This part of the draw really opens up now that Jankovic is gone - and you have to like Safina to get through to the final (though you can't count out Dokic - but more on that in a mo.) But she had a real fight on her hands against Alize Cornet today - but she picked it up and sorted it out (not that you'd know that if you read her press conference.) I liked what I saw from Dinara a whole lot more than what I saw from Jankovic today. She may berate herself all she likes and criticise herself and have screaming matches with her coach - I'm still convinced that there is something very strange about the Zeljko Krajan/Dinara Safina relationship, considering all either of them seem to do is criticise her, but it obviously works - but she stepped it up and pulled it out. Jankovic is lacking the determination that Safina has in bucketloads. Of course, Cornet played a few loose points when she had match points, allowing Dinara back in, but you can't blame it all on Alize. Dinara's a fighter - and I'm glad, in a way, she had this tough match, because it's all good signs...
*
...but look who she's playing next.
*
I'm going to skip over Federer, who was the next match up, for a sec - though we'll obviously come back to him. (Come on, it's me!) Jelena Dokic. Jelena bloody Dokic. That was one of the best women's tennis matches I have seen in a long time - and has to be one of the best stories to come out of tennis in years. First she has a shaky victory over up-and-comer Tamira Paszek. Then she takes out Chakvetadze, who is admittedly sketchy but still ranked about nine million places higher than Jelena (I was there! I was there!) Then there was the massive victory over Caroline Wozniacki, which I doubt anyone in their right mind would have predicted, because Wozniacki is not only a major new talent, she's just about top #10, and it's been a while since Jelena's been anywhere near there. And now another up-and-comer, her practice partner, big-hitting Alisa Kleybanova, the conqueror of Ana Ivanovic. All this on a court which she was booed off the last time she played. But she is resilient. She is tough. She is as determined as she come. And it is so sweet to see the Bikic brothers supporting her, cheering their hearts out in her box, She's shaken off the shackles of Damir, and she is BACK.
*
Normally, I wouldn't cheer against Dinara Safina for anyone. But for this fairytale, I think I'm going to have to. Because if Jelena Dokic can come through Safina, then she can come through anyone in this tournament. And wouldn't that be something.
*
Because that match was such an epic, the match between Djokovic and Baghdatis didn't start till late - not as late as the Baghdatis/Hewitt epic last year, but late enough that it didn't finish till nearly three in the morning. Man, this was an intriguing match - and Baghdatis was never quite out of it. If he had been coming in with more matches under his belt, I would not have liked Djokovic's chances one little bit. When he was on - for example, when he went up 4-1 in the second - Marcos was very impressive. When he was off - for example, the entire first set - it wasn't pretty. It's not injuries still bothering him, I think - just a lack of matchplay. He's rusty. But give him some time and he'll sort that out. Marcos is coming back.
*
You can't deny that Djokovic played pretty well - he certainly lifted - but my personal bias aside, I'm not sure he has a big chance of defending the title. Let's say he did get to the final - which means he'd have to get through Federer, which I would doubt. But let's say the unthinkable happened and he did. He'd meet either Blake, Tsonga, Murray or Nadal. I could maybe see him taking Blake, but the other three? No way. Monfils or Simon are other possibilities, and I could definitely see him losing to them. Verdasco he could maybe take. But he'd have to take Federer in the first place, and I don't see that happening.
*
But Jodi, I hear you say, Roger nearly got bounced by Berdych yesterday! You speak the crazy speak! But listen, my friends, listen - what is it makes a champion? (What is it that Jelena Jankovic so comprehensively lacked?) Sure, it's nice when the Fed is on cruise control, but when he's between a rock and a hard place and he can play his way out - that is when he reveals his true quality. He looked for a way to win. He wore Berdych down. He said he could have played another three sets if he had to, and I believe him. I don't think this match is going to hurt him at all. I think he underestimated Berdych a bit coming into the match - who wouldn't, if you'd beaten him seven times in a row? - and that hurt him. As well as the fact that Berdych absolutely redlined his game. But he worked it out. He never gave up. And that is what makes him great.
*
And remember AO '06? Smooth sailing in the first three rounds, then boom! five sets against Tommy Haas. Two more tough matches against Davydenko and Kiefer, and a really tough final against Baghdatis. But he found a way to win. This has precedent. And this is Roger Federer we're dealing with. And in the end, that's something everyone in the draw needs to remember. One of the commentators was saying yesterday that Steffi Graf's coach told her that, if ever she was losing a match, she should remember that she was Steffi Graf. I bet you Roger Federer can do just the same thing. Because there are some things that man does not do - and one of them is give up without a fight!
*
*
Today's Results
*
Australian Open
*
Men's Draw
*
Roger Federer def. Tomas Berdych, 4-6 6-7 (4-7) 6-4 6-4 6-2
Novak Djokovic def. Marcos Baghdatis, 6-1 7-6 (7-1) 6-7 (5-7) 6-2
Andy Roddick def. Tommy Robredo, 7-5 6-1 6-3
Juan Martin del Potro def. Marin Cilic, 5-7 6-4 6-4 6-2
*
*
Women's Draw
*
Marion Bartoli def. Jelena Jankovic, 6-1 6-4
Dinara Safina def. Alizé Cornet, 6-2 2-6 7-5
Vera Zvonareva def. Nadia Petrova, 7-5 6-4
Jelena Dokic def. Alisa Kleybanova, 7-5 5-7 8-6